Analytic methods for examining race and ethnic disparity in the juvenile courts

✍ Scribed by John M MacDonald

• Publisher: Elsevier Science
• Year: 2001
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 149 KB
• Volume: 29
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0047-2352
• DOI: 10.1016/s0047-2352(01)00113-1

✦ Synopsis

Prior studies of juvenile court decision making and racial disparity are often criticized for their lack of methodological rigor. These studies are criticized for focusing their analyses on separate decision-making stages and not taking into account issues that are related to sample selection. This research attempted to address these issues through an analysis of juvenile court case records from the state of Hawaii. Different limited dependent variable models were used to estimate ethnic disparity in juvenile court outcomes. Comparisons of models according to the Bayesian Information Criteria (BICs) are used to assess the overall fit of these models. The findings indicate few substantive differences across models and a general leniency of the court in favor of White youth. The findings do reveal that there are differences in the accuracy with which these models predicted juvenile court outcomes. The usefulness of this method of model comparison for disparity research is discussed.