## Abstract Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 131β146 (March 2009) DOI: 10.1002/env.915 On page 144 of the above paper, under Discussion, the first sentence of the third paragraph should read, βThe dynamic factor model proposed in Section 3 could be adapted to model a single pollutant that is repeatedly
Analysis of the effects of ultrafine particulate matter while accounting for human exposure
β Scribed by B. J. REICH; Montserrat Fuentes; Janet Burke
- Book ID
- 102187816
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 290 KB
- Volume
- 20
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1180-4009
- DOI
- 10.1002/env.915
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Particulate matter (PM) has been associated with mortality in several epidemiological studies. The US EPA currently regulates PM~10~ and PM~2.5~ (mass concentration of particles with diameter less than 10 and 2.5 Β΅m, respectively), but it is not clear which size of particles are most responsible for adverse heath outcomes. A current hypothesis is that ultrafine particles with diameter less than 0.1 Β΅m are particularly harmful because their small size allows them to deeply penetrate the lungs. This paper investigates the association between exposure to particles of varying diameter and daily mortality. We propose a new dynamic factor analysis model to relate the ambient concentrations of several sizes of particles with diameters ranging from 0.01 to 0.40 Β΅m with mortality. We introduce a Bayesian model that converts ambient concentrations into simulated personal exposure using the EPA's Stochastic Human Exposure and Dose Simulator, and relates simulated exposure with mortality. Using new data from Fresno, CA, we find that the 4βday lag of particles with diameter between 0.02 and 0.08 Β΅m is associated with mortality. This is consistent with the small particles hypothesis. Copyright Β© 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Particulate matter (PM) air pollution is one of the most prevalent involuntary exposures throughout the world with close to 100% of the population being exposed to levels of PM for which adverse health effects have been observed. Because humans primarily come into contact with PM via air, lung and a