## Abstract It has been shown that two‐locus linkage analysis can, for some two‐locus disease models, be used to detect effects at disease loci that do not reach significance in a genome scan. However, few examples exist where two‐locus linkage has been successfully used to map genes. We study the
Analysis of single-locus tests to detect gene/disease associations
✍ Scribed by Kathryn Roeder; Silviu-Alin Bacanu; Vibhor Sonpar; Xiaohua Zhang; B. Devlin
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 155 KB
- Volume
- 28
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0741-0395
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
A goal of association analysis is to determine whether variation in a particular candidate region or gene is associated with liability to complex disease. To evaluate such candidates, ubiquitous Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) are useful. It is critical, however, to select a set of SNPs that are in substantial linkage disequilibrium (LD) with all other polymorphisms in the region. Whether there is an ideal statistical framework to test such a set of ‘tag SNPs’ for association is unknown. Compared to tests for association based on frequencies of haplotypes, recent evidence suggests tests for association based on linear combinations of the tag SNPs (Hotelling T^2^ test) are more powerful. Following this logical progression, we wondered if single‐locus tests would prove generally more powerful than the regression‐based tests? We answer this question by investigating four inferential procedures: the maximum of a series of test statistics corrected for multiple testing by the Bonferroni procedure, T~B~, or by permutation of case‐control status, T~P~; a procedure that tests the maximum of a smoothed curve fitted to the series of of test statistics, T~S~; and the Hotelling T^2^ procedure, which we call T~R~. These procedures are evaluated by simulating data like that from human populations, including realistic levels of LD and realistic effects of alleles conferring liability to disease. We find that power depends on the correlation structure of SNPs within a gene, the density of tag SNPs, and the placement of the liability allele. The clearest pattern emerges between power and the number of SNPs selected. When a large fraction of the SNPs within a gene are tested, and multiple SNPs are highly correlated with the liability allele, T~S~ has better power. Using a SNP selection scheme that optimizes power but also requires a substantial number of SNPs to be genotyped (roughly 10–20 SNPs per gene), power of T~P~ is generally superior to that for the other procedures, including T~R~. Finally, when a SNP selection procedure that targets a minimal number of SNPs per gene is applied, the average performances of T~P~ and T~R~ are indistinguishable. Genet. Epidemiol. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Previous studies testing the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) locus for association with alcoholism have produced conflicting results. Failure to screen controls for substance abuse and failure to assess alcoholics for severity have been proposed as causes for the inability of some studies to detect an a
Linkage analyses and association studies were employed to detect disease susceptibility loci leading to elevated Q1 levels in Problem 2B. Phenotypes were defined to be the dichotomous affection status, the quantitative value for Q1, and Q1 adjusted for covariates. The method of mod-scores (for the d
Background: Glucocorticoids and monoclonal antibodies to tumor necrosis factor reduce inflammation in Crohn's disease (CD). Rapid luminal healing, however, may promote intestinal stricture formation. The aim of this study was to examine fibrosis-associated gene expression in the intestine of patient