## Abstract When faculty members are evaluated, they are judged in part by the impact and quality of their scholarly publications. While all academic institutions look to publication counts and venues as well as the subjective opinions of peers, many hiring, tenure, and promotion committees also re
Analysis of Scifinder Scholar and Web of Science citation searches
β Scribed by Katherine M. Whitley
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 198 KB
- Volume
- 53
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1532-2882
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The Institute for Scientific Information's (ISI, now Thomson Scientific, Philadelphia, PA) citation databases have been used for decades as a starting point and often as the only tools for locating citations and/or conducting citation analyses. The ISI databases (or Web of Science [WoS]
## Abstract We present evidence that in some research fields, research published in journals and reported on the Web may collectively represent different evolutionary stages of the field, with journals lagging a few years behind the Web on average, and that a βtwoβtierβ scholarly communication syst
## Abstract This study uses citations to a group of 42 LIS faculty members to examine the differences between Scopus and WoS in mapping the faculties' intellectual impact, focusing on the sources of their citations by universities, journals, and countries. The study also examines the effects of add