𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Analysis of peptides and proteins in their binding to GroEL

✍ Scribed by Yali Li; Zhida Zheng; Andrew Ramsey; Lingling Chen


Book ID
105359917
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
239 KB
Volume
16
Category
Article
ISSN
1075-2617

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The GroEL–GroES is an essential molecular chaperon system that assists protein folding in cell. Binding of various substrate proteins to GroEL is one of the key aspects in GroEL‐assisted protein folding. Small peptides may mimic segments of the substrate proteins in contact with GroEL and allow detailed structural analysis of the interactions. A model peptide SBP has been shown to bind to a region in GroEL that is important for binding of substrate proteins. Here, we investigated whether the observed GroEL–SBP interaction represented those of GroEL–substrate proteins, and whether SBP was able to mimic various aspects of substrate proteins in GroE‐assisted protein folding cycle. We found that SBP competed with substrate proteins, including α‐lactalbumin, rhodanese, and malate dehydrogenase, in binding to GroEL. SBP stimulated GroEL ATP hydrolysis rate in a manner similar to that of α‐lactalbumin. SBP did not prevent GroES from binding to GroEL, and GroES association reduced the ATPase rates of GroEL/SBP and GroEL/α‐lactalbumin to a comparable extent. Binding of both SBP and α‐lactalbumin to apo GroEL was dominated by hydrophobic interaction. Interestingly, association of α‐lactalbumin to GroEL/GroES was thermodynamically distinct from that to GroEL with reduced affinity and decreased contribution from hydrophobic interaction. However, SBP did not display such differential binding behaviors to apo GroEL and GroEL/GroES, likely due to the lack of a contiguous polypeptide chain that links all of the bound peptide fragments. Nevertheless, studies using peptides provide valuable information on the nature of GroEL–substrate protein interaction, which is central to understand the mechanism of GroEL‐assisted protein folding. Copyright © 2010 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Selectivity in heavy metal- binding to p
✍ Tara M. DeSilva; Gianluigi Veglia; Fernando Porcelli; Andrew M. Prantner; Stanle 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English ⚖ 171 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract The metal‐binding affinities and three‐dimensional structures of three synthetic 18‐residue peptides with sequences derived from that of the highly conserved metal‐binding motif MXCXXC found in many heavy metal‐binding proteins were determined. A change in register of the cysteines and

Meta sequence analysis of human blood pe
✍ Peter Bowden; Voitek Pendrak; Peihong Zhu; John G. Marshall 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier 🌐 English ⚖ 345 KB

Sequence analysis of the blood peptides and their qualities will be key to understanding the mechanisms that contribute to error in LC-ESI-MS/MS. Analysis of peptides and their proteins at the level of sequences is much more direct and informative than the comparison of disparate accession numbers.

Vibrational analysis of conformation in
✍ S. Krimm 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English ⚖ 408 KB 👁 2 views

## Synopsis A vibrational force field for the polypeptide chain has been developed for normal-mode analysis of such molecules. It can reproduce observed frequencies of known structures to within about 5 cm-l. We review the application of this technique to conformational problems in peptides (@-tur