✦ LIBER ✦

ANALYSIS OF CATHEPSIN D FORMS AND THEIR CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS IN HUMAN PROSTATE CANCER

✍ Scribed by CHERRY, JAMES P.; MORDENTE, JOHN A.; CHAPMAN, JOHN R.; CHOUDHURY, MUHAMMAD S.; TAZAKI, HIROSHI; MALLOUH, CAMILLE; KONNO, SENSUKE

Book ID: 123135963
Publisher: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Year: 1998
Tongue: English
Weight: 922 KB
Volume: 160
Category: Article
ISSN: 0022-5347
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62300-0

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Recurrent Gene Fusions in Prostate Cance

Recurrent Gene Fusions in Prostate Cancer: Their Clinical Implications and Uses

✍ Hessels, Daphne; Schalken, Jack A. 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 238 KB

Analysis of cholinesterases in human pro

Analysis of cholinesterases in human prostate and sperm: Implications in cancer and fertility

✍ Susana Nieto-Cerón; Héctor Vargas-López; Mariano Pérez-Albacete; Isabel Tovar-Za 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 167 KB

Presence and significance of unique circ

Presence and significance of unique circulating forms of cathepsin D in ovarian cancer

✍ Christopher Watkins 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 🌐 English ⚖ 131 KB

The Epidemiology and Clinical Implicatio

The Epidemiology and Clinical Implications of Genetic Variation in Prostate Cancer

✍ Helfand, Brian T.; Catalona, William J. 📂 Article 📅 2014 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 606 KB

Determination of cathepsin S abundance a

Determination of cathepsin S abundance and activity in human plasma and implications for clinical investigation

✍ Cox, Jennifer M.; Troutt, Jason S.; Knierman, Michael D.; Siegel, Robert W.; Qia 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 607 KB

Clinical significance of cathepsin D ass

Clinical significance of cathepsin D assay in breast cancer tissues

✍ Yukashi Itoh; Shunzo Kobayashi; Hirotaka Iwase; Hiroko Yamashita; Tatsuya Kuzush 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 474 KB

## Abstract Cathepsin D was assayed in 74 primary breast cancer specimens by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and immunohistochemical assay (ICA). Of the 74 specimens, 38 (51.4%) were scored positive by ICA, and 25 (33.8%) were scored positive by EIA. The coincidence rate between ICA and EIA was 71.6% (53/