An update on treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection and viral load assessments
✍ Scribed by Bryan Cobb; Regis A. Vilchez
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2012
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 724 KB
- Volume
- 55
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-9139
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
According to the recently released American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 chronic infection, 1 in treatment-naı ¨ve subjects the association of boceprevir or telaprevir with peginterferon-alpha and ribavirin is strongly recommended as the optimal therapy. In patients treated with boceprevir, peginterferon, and ribavirin, a response-guided treatment schedule was established at week 8, through the assessment of HCV RNA level, making feasible a shortened duration of treatment (i.e., 28 weeks) in the case of undetectable viral replication. In this regard, we believe that the choice of 8 weeks for the definition of treatment duration needs some comment. The phase 2 and 3 clinical trials with boceprevir 2,3 featured the use of peginterferon-ribavirin for 4 weeks (the lead-in period) before boceprevir was added. The reasons for starting with a lead-in phase would be to lower HCV-RNA before exposure to a protease inhibitor in order to reduce the risk of resistance and viral breakthrough. 2 However, in the studies mentioned the achievement of virologic response after the lead-in therapy (4 weeks) was shown to be highly effective for the prediction of sustained virologic response (SVR; HCV-RNA undetectability leading to SVR in a percentage of patients between 89% and 100%, independently from the treatment arm). 2,3 Indeed, Poordad et al. 3 stated that in patients with undetectable HCV RNA levels after the lead-in period, boceprevir administration would not result in a higher rate of SVR than that obtained with the use of standard therapy. Therefore, the lead-in period as well as interleukin (IL)-28B genotype assessment might be used to better define the eligible patients for peginterferon introduction, thus avoiding their possible overuse with additional costs and side effects. In our opinion, it seems to be reasonable to reconsider the assessment of HCV-RNA at week 4 (end of lead-in) in the response-guided treatment guidelines of naı ¨ve genotype-1-infected patients.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The viral genotype may influence the response to interferon sion and more efficient antiviral immune response, is still (IFN) treatment in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. unclear. To characterize potential mechanisms responsible for this ef-Several factors including viral load, disease se
## Abstract Patients with high viral load (≥1.0 × 10^5^ IU/ml) of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b do not achieve high sustained virological response rates to interferon (IFN)/ribavirin combination therapy. Previous studies suggested that pretreatment amino acid (aa) substitution patterns in the
## Abstract One hundred twenty‐six mother‐infant couples were studied and 105 exposed babies were monitored for at least 12 months to define the risk of mother‐to‐infant HCV transmission. Infection occurred in 5 out of 76 infants (6.6%) born to 69 viraemic mothers and in none of 29 born to 26 non‐v
## Abstract An investigation was carried out to determine whether early viral monitoring could predict efficiently the virological response to combination therapy of two different regimens in treatment‐naïve chronic hepatitis C patients infected with genotype 1b with high baseline viral load. Patie
biochemical and histological improvement. 3,4 Several factors Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b and high precan predict a poor response to interferon therapy, e.g., high treatment virus load are predictive factors of poor repretreatment virus load, genotype 1b, advanced histological sponse to inte