๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

An overview of the visual optimization tools in JPEG 2000

โœ Scribed by Wenjun Zeng; Scott Daly; Shawmin Lei


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
648 KB
Volume
17
Category
Article
ISSN
0923-5965

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The human visual system plays a key role in the final perceived quality of the compressed images. It is therefore desirable to allow system designers and users to take advantage of the current knowledge of visual perception and models in a compression system. In this paper, we review the various tools in JPEG 2000 that allow its users to exploit many properties of the human visual system such as spatial frequency sensitivity, color sensitivity, and the visual masking effects. We show that the visual tool sets in JPEG 2000 are much richer than what is achievable in JPEG, where only spatially invariant frequency weighting can be exploited. As a result, the visually optimized JPEG 2000 images can usually have much better visual quality than the visually optimized JPEG images at the same bit rates. Some visual comparisons between different visual optimization tools, as well as some visual comparisons between JPEG 2000 and JPEG, will be shown.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


An overview of the JPEG 2000 still image
โœ Majid Rabbani; Rajan Joshi ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 800 KB

In 1996, the JPEG committee began to investigate possibilities for a new still image compression standard to serve current and future applications. This initiative, which was named JPEG 2000, has resulted in a comprehensive standard (ISO 154447ITU-T Recommendation T.800) that is being issued in six

An octree-based algorithm for the optimi
๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› Society of Manufacturing Engineers ๐ŸŒ English โš– 154 KB

and kevword index of a gage is improved by reducing the remaining on-line measurement loss cost with the concept of guard limits. Feasible guard limits can be determined by considering the measurement loss cost resulting from both type I errors and type II errors. Instead of applying a series of gag