An MMPI-based empirical model of malingering and deception
✍ Scribed by Dr. Kirk Heilbrun; William S. Bennett; Adam J. White; Jennifer Kelly
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1990
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 636 KB
- Volume
- 8
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0735-3936
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The empirically‐based model of malingering and deception described by Rogers (1984b) was operationalized using MMPI and clinical interview data. Subjects (N = 159) were patients committed to an inpatient forensic hospital as ‘Incompetent to Stand Trial’ or ‘Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity’. Inter‐rater reliability was acceptable for the 11 criteria used to define response styles. Each subject was categorized into one of five response style groups: ‘Reliable’, ‘Malingering’, ‘Defensive’, ‘Irrelevant’, or ‘Unclassifiable’. Factor analysis of the rating criteria yielded four factors, three of which are comparable to the assigned groups, providing some validation for the constructs underlying these groups.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
We construct an empirical model for daily highs and daily lows of US stock indexes based on the intuition that highs and lows do not drift apart over time. Our empirical results show that daily highs and lows of three main US stock price indexes are cointegrated. Data on openings, closings, and trad
The aim of the present experiment was to examine to what extent participants experience attempted control, cognitive load and arousal when they lie and tell the truth under lowerstakes and higher-stakes conditions. We expected both differences and similarities between truth tellers and liars. We exp