๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

An M1-selective muscarinic receptor antagonist telenzepine improves lung function in patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis

โœ Scribed by M. Cazzola; G. D'Amato; E. Guidetti; H. Staudinger; V.W. Steinijans; U. Kilian


Publisher
Elsevier
Year
1990
Tongue
English
Weight
426 KB
Volume
3
Category
Article
ISSN
0952-0600

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The effect of an M1-selective muscarinic receptor antagonist telenzepine on lung function was investigated in 18 patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis in a double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover study. FEV1, FEF50, PEF and FVC were measured every 0.5 h up to 2 h, then every 1 h up to 6 h after administration of a single, oral dose of 5 mg in the morning. Compared with placebo, telenzepine increased (time average over 6 hours; median and 68%-range): 1) FEV1 from 1.46 (0.81, 2.06) to 1.67 (1.06, 2.40) l, p less than 0.01; 2) PEF from 3.58 (2.33, 4.55) to 3.88 (3.10, 5.07) l/s, p less than 0.01; 3) FEF50 from 0.93 (0.45, 1.58) to 1.17 (0.67, 1.90) l/s, p less than 0.001. Whereas the median increase in FEV1 15 min after 2 puffs of salbutamol was 20% (range 15 to 74%), FEV1 improved by 32% (range -15 to 130%) at the time of maximum difference between placebo and telenzepine. The heart rate did not change. We conclude that in patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis substantial improvement of lung function parameters can be achieved by an M1-receptor antagonist. It is possible that with the dose administered direct actions on muscarinic receptors on the smooth muscle (M3) contribute to the observed bronchodilatation. The unchanged heart rate indicates little effect on cardiac M2-receptors.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Effect of Telenzepine, an M1-Selective M
โœ M. Cazzola; M.G. Matera; G. Liccardi; G. Sacerdoti; G. D'Amato; F. Rossi ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1994 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier ๐ŸŒ English โš– 346 KB

Muscarinic M1-receptor antagonists can prevent the induction of a long-lasting excitatory postsynaptic potential in autonomic ganglia. As the prolonged occupation of M1-receptors is a possible protective mechanism against vagal overstimulation, M1-antagonists might prove to be effective in preventin