This study focuses on examining the structure of decision support systems (DSS) research, with a particular emphasis on assessing the contributions of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) to the development of each of the DSS subspecialty areas. This study traces how concepts and findings by resear
An investigation of the role of scale values in the DS/AHP method of multi-criteria decision making
β Scribed by Malcolm J. Beynon
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 326 KB
- Volume
- 11
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1057-9214
- DOI
- 10.1002/mcda.339
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
DS/AHP is a method of multiβcriteria decision making based on the DempsterβShafer theory of evidence and the analytic hierarchy process. Central to the utilization of DS/AHP is the composing of preference judgements on identified groups of decision alternatives (DA) across a number of criteria against all the DA present in the problem in question. This paper exposits a series of results whose objectives are to aid in the development of an effective set of preference scale values for use within DS/AHP. These results relate directly to the concomitant level of ignorance (uncertainty) with the judgements made on a single criterion. Two particular directions of investigation are undertaken, firstly in determining the necessary number of scale values available and secondly finding the necessary differences between scale values, dependent on whether an arithmetic or geometric progression is the basis for the scale values. Through an example, the implications and utilization of these results within DS/AHP are illustrated. Copyright Β© 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Analytic efforts in support of portfolio decisions can be applied with varying levels of intensity. To gain insight about how to match the effort to the situation, we simulate a portfolio of potential projects and compare portfolio performance under a range of analytic strategies. Each
A collective information sampling model and observations of discussion content suggest that decision-making groups often fail to disseminate unshared information. This paper examines the role that a fully-informed minority may play in facilitating the sampling and consideration of unshared informati