An improved zero-one law for algorithmically random sequences
β Scribed by Steven M. Kautz
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 582 KB
- Volume
- 191
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0304-3975
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Results on random oracles typically involve showing that a class {X :P(X)} has Lebesgue measure one, i.e., that some property P(X) holds for "almost every X". A potentially more informative approach is to show that P(X) is true for every X in some explicitly defined class of random sequences or languages. In this note we consider the algorithmically random sequences originally defined by Martin-Lijf and their generalizations, the n-random sequences. Our result is an effective form of the classical zero-one law: for each n > 1, if a class {X : P(X)} is closed under finite variation and has arithmetical complexity ,Yi+, or ZZz+, (roughly, the property P can be expressed with n + 1 alternations of quantifiers), then either P holds for every n-random sequence or else holds for none of them. This result has been used by Book and Mayordomo to give new characterizations of complexity classes of the form ALMOST-W, the languages which can be <@-reduced to almost every oracle, where W is a reducibility.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Natural languages and random structures are given for which there are sentences A with no limit probability, yet for every A the difference between the probabilities that A holds on random structures of sizes n and n + 1 approaches zero with n.
We look at a competitor of the ErdosαRenyi models of random graphs, one ΛαΊ Ε½ .x proposed in E. Gilbert J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math. 9:4, 533α543 1961 : given β¦ ) 0 and a metric space X of diameter ) β¦ , scatter n vertices at random on X and connect those of distance -β¦ apart: we get a random graph G
Let mlzk be a median of X,, and put S, = X,, + + X , + . . . +Xnkrt-A,, where {A,, n= 1, 2, . . .} is a sequence of constants. S, and X,, are subject to F, and F,,, respectively. The problem is the existence of a non-defective limit distribution for {Fn, n = 1, 2, . . .} in the sence of weak conver