𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

An improved constitutive model for the numerical simulation of semi-solid thixoforming

✍ Scribed by R. Koeune; J.-P. Ponthot


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
917 KB
Volume
234
Category
Article
ISSN
0377-0427

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


In order to model thixoforming processes, previous papers presented a thermomechanical one-phase modelling. This first version of the constitutive model revealed several limitations: the model could not degenerate properly to pure solid or liquid behavior nor to free solid suspensions. The aim of this paper was to propose solutions to overcome these limitations.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Simple numerical model (PRAM) for simula
✍ Ramesh Keshavaraj; Richard W. Tock; Guy S. Nusholtz πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 444 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

The pressure-time history of a deployed airbag provides the basis for the restraint created by this safety system. A simple numerical simulation of this pressuretime history was developed based on our understanding of the various factors that influence the restraint performance. The general interact

Three-point bending tests. Part II: An i
✍ F. GuitiΓ‘n; P. Quintela; M. T. SΓ‘nchez; V. ValcΓ‘rcel πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 802 KB

The goal of this paper is to analyze analytical and numerically, from several perspectives, the modulus of rupture (MOR) for brittle materials, studying the bending test of three points which is normally used in laboratory to calculate it. In particular, we will give four different approaches to the

An improvement in the calculation of the
✍ Slobodan I. Babic; Cevdet Akyel πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 47 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract The above article was published in Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 493–504, (October 2005). A number of imperfections were subsequently identified and have been corrected below. On page 497, the following equation has been corrected to: On page 501, the following equation has been correct