Gribbin et al. (1992) argue that futures prices are not stable paretian distributed. But, Liu and Brorsen (1992) argue that Cribbin et al. have shown that futures prices are not identically independently stably distributed, but that a stable distribution with time varying scale parameter cannot be r
An examination of the distribution of futures price changes
โ Scribed by Billy P. Helms; Terrence F. Martell
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1985
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 604 KB
- Volume
- 5
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-7314
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
n the finance literature considerable attention has been given to the distribution I of stock and commodity price changes. Contributing to this body of literature, this study examines the distribution of successive intraday price changes in various financial and nonfinancial futures contracts. Two different tests are used to ascertain if these price changes are normally distributed. We further tested to see if the distribution more closely conformed to the form of some other member of the class of stable distributions.
The first section of this article reviews some of the more important empirical contributions in this area. Section I1 discusses the unique nature of our data. The third section presents and interprets our results, while Section IV summarizes our findings.
I. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
The majority of the research on the distributions of security prices has examined the distributions of stock prices or returns. Osborne (1959) showed that stock price changes fit a lognormal distribution better than a normal distribution. Fama (1965) and Mandelbrot (1963) called attention to the fact that there was substantial deviation from normality in the distribution of the log of stock price changes. This observation led to an examination of more general distributions. The appropriateness of a stable Paretian distribution has been examined by Mandelbrot and Taylor (1967) and Fama and Roll (1968, 1971). Papers by Fielitz and Smith (1972) and Boness, Chen, and Jatusipitak (1974) argue that the moment-generating function may not be a stable
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
any empirical studies of daily returns on common stocks and other financial M assets in United States markets have reported daily. patterns that are seemingly inexplicable (Cross, 1973, French, 1980, Gibbons and Hess, 1981 and Keim and Stambaugh, 1984). Recently, Jaffe and Westerfield (1985) report
## Nabar prices, therefore, reflect equilibrium risk premiums. The bulk of the previous empirical studies that have attempted to gain insights into the determinants of the risk premiums in futures markets have applied methodologies built upon the equilibrium asset pricing models to both financial
T composite stock index futures prices to associated normative prices as specified by an arbitrage argument while controlling for significant market imperfections. This research contrasts with earlier empirical works in several ways. First, the arbitrage argument is maintained despite the assumption
Pricing and the Effect of an ## Anticipated Price Change Avner Wolf is article commodity examines theoretical aspects of Black's (1976) pricing formula of r options and the effect on the option's premium of an anticipated future drift in the futures price. In the first part, we derive the formula
The purpose of this article is to characterize linear and nonlinear serial dependence in daily futures price changes. The daily prices of four futures are included in this study: (i) S&P 500; (ii) Japanese yen; (iii) Deutsche mark; and (iv) Eurodollar. Our major empirical findings are: (i) Based on