𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

An evaluation of the strength of the posterior wall of the inguinal canal in women

✍ Scribed by F. Glassow


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1973
Tongue
English
Weight
347 KB
Volume
60
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-1323

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

In the period 1945–71, 124 women with primary direct inguinal hernia were operated upon. During the same period indirect inguinal hernias in women were noted to be thirteen times more common than the direct type. The commonest site of protrusion of the direct hernia was immediately medial to the inferior epigastric artery. In contrast, in a series of 110 women with recurrent inguinal hernia the majority of the hernias were direct and, of these, most were either situated medially in the posterior wall of the inguinal canal or involved the whole posterior wall.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The posterior wall of the inguinal canal
✍ Michael J. Blunt πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1951 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 465 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

over the past year and a half, but there has been no recurrence to date, and no sequelae indicative of undue compression or tension on the cord. A description is given at this stage because I consider the method deserves a trial from those with access to a larger number of cases than I could obtain

Inguinal canal development: The muscular
✍ Susana N. Biasutto; Emanuel Repetto; Mirta M. Aliendo; Valeria N. Borghino πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 263 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract The inguinal canal is an anatomically complex region. Although much has been written about the gubernaculum and the descent of the testis, little is known about the development of the abdominal wall itself. We dissected this inguinal canal in 75 fetuses between 10 and 25 weeks of gestat

Reply to β€œComment on Inguinal Canal Deve
✍ Susana N. Biasutto πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 30 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

We thank Dr. Rashmi Patil's (Patil, 2009) comments and interest demonstrated on the article (Biasutto et al., 2009). About the numerical mistakes he mentioned, we assume that (1) the number of fetuses dissected were 75. The ''35 females'' was a typing mistake that we did not realize while checking