๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

An evaluation of the modified Airway Management Device

โœ Scribed by R. Sivasankar; U. B. Bahlmann; M. R. Stacey; A. Sehgal; R. C. Hughes; J. E. Hall


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
73 KB
Volume
58
Category
Article
ISSN
0003-2409

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Summary

We evaluated the modified Airway Management Device (AMD^TM^) in 60 spontaneously breathing anaesthetised patients. The insertion and removal of the device was very easy and atraumatic. The airway was secured on the first attempt in 41 patients (70%; 95% CI 57โ€“80%). The most important problem was loss of airway, which occurred in 11 patients (19%; 11โ€“30%) during maintenance of anaesthesia. The AMD was dislodged during maintenance in one patient. There was a loss of the airway in 12 patients (20%; 12โ€“31%); in 10, it was maintained with simple airway manoeuvres or a laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation was required in two patients. Ten of these patients were male and two were female; the failure rate was 33% (12โ€“31%) among the male patients and 6% (2โ€“22%) among the female patients. The cuff volumes ranged from 4โ€ƒml to 80โ€ƒml and cuff pressures from 6 cmโ€ƒH~2~O to 92 cmโ€ƒH~2~O. Blood was seen on removal in three patients (6%; 2โ€“16%) and nine patients (18%; 10โ€“30%) experienced sore throat after removal of the device.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


An evaluation of the Airway Management D
โœ T. M. Cook; K. Gupta; D. A. Gabbott; J. P. Nolan ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 111 KB

We have evaluated the Airway Management Device (AMDโ„ข) in 105 anaesthetised patients. We were successful in establishing a clear airway on the first attempt on 69 occasions and unable to establish a patent airway at all in 10 patients. Airway obstruction requiring removal of the device occurred durin