We have evaluated the Airway Management Device (AMDโข) in 105 anaesthetised patients. We were successful in establishing a clear airway on the first attempt on 69 occasions and unable to establish a patent airway at all in 10 patients. Airway obstruction requiring removal of the device occurred durin
An evaluation of the modified Airway Management Device
โ Scribed by R. Sivasankar; U. B. Bahlmann; M. R. Stacey; A. Sehgal; R. C. Hughes; J. E. Hall
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 73 KB
- Volume
- 58
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0003-2409
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Summary
We evaluated the modified Airway Management Device (AMD^TM^) in 60 spontaneously breathing anaesthetised patients. The insertion and removal of the device was very easy and atraumatic. The airway was secured on the first attempt in 41 patients (70%; 95% CI 57โ80%). The most important problem was loss of airway, which occurred in 11 patients (19%; 11โ30%) during maintenance of anaesthesia. The AMD was dislodged during maintenance in one patient. There was a loss of the airway in 12 patients (20%; 12โ31%); in 10, it was maintained with simple airway manoeuvres or a laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation was required in two patients. Ten of these patients were male and two were female; the failure rate was 33% (12โ31%) among the male patients and 6% (2โ22%) among the female patients. The cuff volumes ranged from 4โml to 80โml and cuff pressures from 6 cmโH~2~O to 92 cmโH~2~O. Blood was seen on removal in three patients (6%; 2โ16%) and nine patients (18%; 10โ30%) experienced sore throat after removal of the device.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES