𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Image Features for Image Retrieval

✍ Scribed by Vincenzo Di Lecce; Andrea Guerriero


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
223 KB
Volume
10
Category
Article
ISSN
1047-3203

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Retrieval effectiveness in image databases depends significantly on the features and the distance model utilized to evaluate the similarity of the images. Features must be extracted from images and stored in the database. Since the features should be stored at the time of data entry, it is extremely important to determine which features ensure the best retrieval performances. In this paper a comparison of the most widespread automatic indexing techniques and their performances is presented. The image reference set, necessary for performance comparison, is obtained by including in the database frames extracted from video shots. Frames extracted from a shot are different but have the same semantic content. One of these frames is utilized as an example in a query; the indexing effectiveness is assessed from the frames retrieved. The most relevant features prove to be the angular spectrum, the Hough transform, and the color histogram, followed by local features such as local luminance pattern directionality.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Effective invariant features for shape-b
✍ Shan Li; Moon-Chuen Lee; Donald Adjeroh πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 343 KB

## Abstract The success of content‐based image retrieval (CBIR) relies critically on the ability to find effective image features to represent the database images. The shape of an object is a fundamental image feature and belongs to one of the most important image features used in CBIR. In this art

An investigation of image users across d
✍ Joan Beaudoin πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English βš– 39 KB

## Abstract This study investigates the image behaviors of twenty‐four participants in four separate user groups (six in each group: archaeologists, architects, art historians and artists). These groups of participants were chosen due to their heavy reliance on images to perform their daily work ro