An evaluation of the contribution of soil micromorphology to the study of ancient arable agriculture

✍ Scribed by S. P. Carter; D. A. Davidson

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 1998
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 62 KB
• Volume: 13
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0883-6353
• DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6548(199808)13:6<535::aid-gea1>3.0.co;2-#

✦ Synopsis

This article provides an overview of the development of soil micromorphological studies of ancient agriculture and the current position of research in this field. The stance adopted by the authors is deliberately combative, and it is hoped that the article will stimulate discussion of the current limitations and potentialities of the technique. The findings of this review may be summarized in three proposals: (1) Soil micromorphology cannot be used at present to identify cultivation in ancient soils. Ambiguous or multiple interpretations of soil micromorphological features are unlikely to be resolved, so that the detection of large scale agricultural features in the field (cultivation marks, lynchets) will remain the most secure and direct guides to the presence of a former cultivated soil. Indirect evidence on inferred land use can be provided from pollen and land snail evidence. (2) Micromorphology should retain a key role in the determination of the impact of agriculture on soils, encompassing issues such as erosion, soil structure, fertility, and biological activity. These can be related to agricultural practice: methods of tillage, manuring, soil conservation, and fallowing. (3) Three areas of micromorphological research can be proposed that address the impact of agriculture on soil: study of well-sealed, buried agricultural soils which have a clearly understood ar-(a) the chaeological context; study of recent soils with known agricultural histories; (b) the (c) the establishment of controlled experiments with ancient agricultural techniques.