Background: To evaluate a clinic based intervention designed to improve attitude to follow-up, increase self-efficacy or confidence to care for health, and raise awareness of possible vulnerability to future health issues among survivors of childhood cancer. The intervention included an information
An evaluation of a psychosocial intervention for survivors of childhood cancer: paradoxical effects of response shift over time
โ Scribed by Carolyn E. Schwartz; Rebecca G. Feinberg; Evguenia Jilinskaia; Joan C. Applegate
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 126 KB
- Volume
- 8
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1057-9249
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
This study examined the impact of response shift on a psychosocial treatment evaluation of 22 young adult cancer survivors. An age-matched cohort of 54 healthy controls were included in the study to provide a comparison for normative levels and structure of quality-of-life (QOL). It was found that this evaluation of a psychosocial intervention for young adult cancer survivors was notably influenced by response shift phenomenon. Standard analyses suggested that the intervention had no impact on measured aspects of well-being. It did appear to yield an immediate gain in reported global QOL, but seemed to cause a significant decline over time. By considering response shift, it was highlighted that an apparently deleterious effect on QOL was largely a function of response shift. This response shift effect was reflected not only in changes in internal standards, but also in values and in conceptualization of QOL. The intervention seemed to have normalized survivors' conceptualization of QOL so that it was increasingly similar to their age-matched cohort. Future psychosocial intervention research should explicitly consider response shift in a randomized treatment evaluation.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Monitoring of therapy-related late effects after acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy in childhood has become an increasingly important area in posttherapeutic patient surveillance. The usefulness of conventional electro-encephalographic (EEG) investigations as part of these attempts is contro