## Abstract This study develops evaluation indicators for a consortium of Korean institutional repositories called βdCollectionβ and validates the indicators against actual data from the participants of this consortium. The literature review reveals a conceptual framework for institutional reposito
An Evaluation Model for the National Consortium of Institutional Repositories of Korean Universities
β Scribed by Hyun Hee Kim; Yong Ho Kim
- Publisher
- Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 80 KB
- Volume
- 43
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0044-7870
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
This study, funded by KERIS (The Korean Education and Research Information Service) aims at building an evaluation model for diagnosing and solving problems of the βdCollectionβ consortium, composed of institutional repositories at more than 40 universities. The evaluation model, as tools not only for a member library's selfβevaluation of its own system but also for assessment of the dCollection systems as a whole, is set up in two steps: First, based upon literature review from digital library evaluation and institutional repositories, and case studies on university repositories, the conceptual framework was composed of four categories: content; system and network; uses, users and submitters; and management and policy. And, second, the evaluation framework was modified through three methods, such as a Delphi method, an expert forum and a simulation test, leading to the evaluation model with 4 categories and 34 indicators.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Background Numbers of older people are increasing rapidly in many developing nations and there is a pressing need for epidemiological studies of psychiatric morbidity, particularly dementia. Valid methods for case identification are an important first step. The Geriatric Mental Stat
## Abstract In this paper, we develop an analytical model of joint maximizing behavior on the part of students and professors to develop policy rules for universities who use student evaluations as tools for increasing professor effort and, thereby, student knowledge. More precisely, we examine the
## Abstract The interrater reliability of the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM) was assessed in a multicentre study. Four sites of the National NeuroAIDS Tissue Consortium performed blinded reratings of audiotaped PRISM interviews of 63 HIVβinfected patients.