## Abstract A survey of 124 users of externally produced financial and economic forecasts in Turkey investigated their expectations and perceptions of forecast quality and their reasons for judgmentally adjusting forecasts. Expectations and quality perceptions mainly related to the timeliness of fo
An empirical investigation of combinations of economic forecasts
β Scribed by K. Holden; D. A. Peel
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1986
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 763 KB
- Volume
- 5
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0277-6693
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This paper examines the effects of combining three econometric and three times-series forecasts of growth and inflation in the U.K. If forecasts are unbiased then a combination exploiting this fact will be more efficient than an unrestricted combination. Ex post econometric forecasts may be biased but ex ante they are unbiased. The results of the study are that a restricted linear combination of the econometric forecasts is superior to an unrestricted combination and also to the unweighted mean of the forecasts. However, it is not preferred to the best of the individual forecasts.
KEY WORDS Combining forecasts Econometric forecasts
Regression Linear constraints
In an innovative paper, Bates and Granger (1969) point out that when a number of different forecasts of the same event are available, each can generally be expected to embody useful information. This is because the forecasts may be based either on different information sets or on alternative assumptions about how the information should be processed. Bates and Granger suggest that if forecasts from different sources are combined in some way, the resulting forecasts may be more accurate than any of the individual components. They also consider a number of methods by which the weights on the different forccasts might be determined. These allow the weights on the forecasts to change in respQnse to past forecast errors. Makridakis and Hibon (1979) and Newbold and Granger (1974) report empirical results using these methods which suggest that combinations of forecasts are superior to individual forecasts. Granger and Ramanathan (1 984) show that if the forecast errors are stationary with a constant covariance matrix, then the optimal weights can be obtained by the unrestricted regression of the outcome series on a constant and the various forecasts. Clemen (1986) argues that forecasting efficiency may be improved if restrictions are imposed, even though they are invalid. However, in practice the assumption of stationary forecasts errors is unlikely to be correct to some degree for economic forecasts. For example, it is well known that forecasters analyse the * Paper presented at the Sixth International Symposium on Forecasting,
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
While there is general agreement that a linear combination of forecasts can outperform the individual forecasts, there is controversy about the appropriateness of the combination method to be used in a given situation. Hence, in any given application it may be more beneficial to combine different s
This paper considers the problem of determining whether forecasts are unbiased and examines the implications this has for combining different forecasts. The practical issues of how economic forecasts might be combined are discussed. There is an empirical illustration of the procedures in which the p
## Abstract Previous studies show that it is not always optimal to combine forecasts of alternative models. In this paper, we propose to use the recent advances in modeling directed acyclic graphs to study the issue of forecast combinations. In forecasting US unemployment rates, we demonstrate that