An Empirical Comparison of Voting Classification Algorithms: Bagging, Boosting, and Variants
β Scribed by Eric Bauer; Ron Kohavi
- Book ID
- 110250975
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 793 KB
- Volume
- 36
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6125
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This paper provides an empirical comparison of two methods of attribute valuation: the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and conjoint analysis. Variants within each approach are also examined. The results of two empirical studies indicate that the methods dier in their predictive and convergent valid
Classification trees provide an attractively transparent discrimination technique, and may be derived from both expert opinion and from data analysis. We consider a real and complex problem concerning the diagnosis of babies with suspected critical congenital heart disease into one of 27 classes. A
The ability of a neural network to generalise is dependent on how representative the training patterns were of the whole data domain, and how smoothly the network has fitted to these patterns [