✦ LIBER ✦

AN AUTOMATED TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF SIGNIFICANT BACTERIURIA

✍ Scribed by Johnston, H.H.; Mitchell, C.J.; Curtis, G.D.W.

Book ID: 123586746
Publisher: The Lancet
Year: 1976
Tongue: English
Weight: 429 KB
Volume: 308
Category: Article
ISSN: 0140-6736
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(76)92411-9

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

AUTOMATED TEST FOR BACTERIURIA

✍ Stokes, E.J. 📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 The Lancet 🌐 English ⚖ 290 KB

The Detection of Significant Bacteriuria

✍ DEUTCH, M. ;JESPERSEN, H. G. 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Wiley (Blackwell Publishing) ⚖ 321 KB

A SIMPLE TEST FOR SIGNIFICANT BACTERIURI

A SIMPLE TEST FOR SIGNIFICANT BACTERIURIA

✍ Simmons, N.A.; Williams, J.D. 📂 Article 📅 1962 🏛 The Lancet 🌐 English ⚖ 325 KB

Detection of Significant Bacteriuria by

Detection of Significant Bacteriuria by Use of the iQ200 Automated Urine Microscope

✍ Sturenburg, E.; Kramer, J.; Schon, G.; Cachovan, G.; Sobottka, I. 📂 Article 📅 2014 🏛 American Society for Microbiology 🌐 English ⚖ 398 KB

Automated methods for detection of bacte

Automated methods for detection of bacteriuria

✍ Marie T. Pezzlo 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 932 KB

Evaluation of two automated systems for

Evaluation of two automated systems for detection of bacteriuria

✍ José Gutiérrez; Antonio Sorlózano; María José Soto; Gonzalo Piédrola 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 101 KB

The Utiscreen-CORAL Biomedical system and ROBOBACT system were tested against conventional uroculture in blood agar and MacConkey agar as a reference method to determine the bacteriuria from 400 samples. For the Utiscreen-CORAL Biomedical system, a sensitivity of 92.5% was obtained. However, by the