๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

An assessment of social validity trends in applied behavior analysis

โœ Scribed by James E. Carr; Jennifer L. Austin; Lisa N. Britton; Karen Kate Kellum; Jon S. Bailey


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
110 KB
Volume
14
Category
Article
ISSN
1072-0847

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


during the ยฎrst 31 years of Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis were assessed for reports of social validity measures. Two measures of social validity (treatment outcome and treatment acceptability) were assessed for each article. In addition, articles were assessed for the incorporation of analog versus naturalistic settings. Overall, treatment outcome and acceptability measures were reported in less than 13% of articles. In addition, studies conducted in naturalistic settings were more likely to report social validity measures than studies conducted in analog settings. Possible reasons for the deยฎcit in the reporting of social validity measures and potential outcomes of this deยฎcit are discussed.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Applied behavior analysis, social valida
โœ Poling, Alan ;Ehrhardt, Kristal ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 115 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Although rarely used in this context, research techniques associated with applied behavior analysis may be especially useful for examining the effects of psychotropic medications in people with mental retardation. One characteristic of applied behavior analysis is that researchers often report socia