An assessment of ‘international best practice’ in visitor attraction management: does Scotland really lag behind?
✍ Scribed by Brian Garrod; Anna Leask; Alan Fyall
- Book ID
- 102444472
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 155 KB
- Volume
- 9
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1099-2340
- DOI
- 10.1002/jtr.591
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts selected management practices among visitor attractions in Scotland, Australia, Canada and New Zealand. The catalyst for the study was the growing perception that management practices among visitor attractions in Scotland are becoming increasingly outdated and that the sector needs to learn from ‘international best practice’ in this respect. A postal questionnaire was sent to all paid‐admission visitor attractions in the four countries. In total, 1022 visitor attractions replied, representing an overall response rate of 41%. Chi‐square analysis was then used to test various hypotheses relating to the uptake of these management practices. A key conclusion is that although management practices do vary significantly among the four countries, Scotland does not necessarily lag behind. Indeed, Scottish visitor attractions seem to lead the way in many respects. Meanwhile, the study finds no strong evidence to suggest that visitor attractions in the other three countries have indeed identified and are following a common ‘international best practice’. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.