AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE USE OF TWO-SIDED TESTS IN CLINICAL TRIALS
โ Scribed by CHARLES W. DUNNETT; MICHAEL GENT
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 700 KB
- Volume
- 15
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0277-6715
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
There is a controversy in the literature concerning the use of one-and two-sided tests in clinical trials. Some contend that, when the research question relates to improved efficacy or safety, that is, the expected change is in one direction only, the hypothesis test should reflect this by being one-sided. Others insist on the use of a two-sided test in case a treatment difference in the opposite direction to that expected might turn up. We propose an alternative procedure to the two-sided test which also provides protection against overlooking a negative effect. The proposed procedure tests simultaneously for a positive difference and for equivalence. We illustrate the procedure by applying it to the results of a recent clinical trial.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract As part of their practice, policymakers have to make economic evaluations using clinical trial data. Recent interest has been expressed in determining how costโeffectiveness analysis can be undertaken in a regression framework. In this respect, published research basically provides a ge
We investigate a resampling method for bias correction in group sequential designs with censored survival data using logrank testing. The method draws nested bootstrap samples of di!erent sizes from the observed data in order to mimic the large sample independent increment property of statistics res
## Background: Strict clinical remission endpoints in ulcerative colitis (uc) trials produce low remission rates and do not reflect the good outcomes of uc therapy. we proposed the use of the vwf (voting with their feet) endpoint, the percentage of subjects leaving a randomized controlled trial (rc