𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

An alternative to R2 for assessing linear models of effect size

✍ Scribed by Ariel M. Aloe; Betsy Jane Becker; Therese D. Pigott

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
167 KB
Volume
1
Category
Article
ISSN
1759-2879

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Improving interpretability: Ξ³ as an alte
Improving interpretability: Ξ³ as an alternative to R2 as a measure of effect size
✍ Daniel D. Reidpath; Mark R. Diamond; Gunter Hartel; Paul Glasziou πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 70 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

A traditional measure of e ect size associated with tests for di erence between two groups is the variance explained by group membership (R 2 ). If exposure to a disease causes a small but long term deΓΏcit in performance, however, R 2 does not capture that cumulating e ect. We propose an alternative

Marginal versus conditional versus β€˜stru
Marginal versus conditional versus β€˜structural source’ models: a rationale for an alternative to log-linear methods for capture-recapture estimates
✍ Ronald R. Regal; Ernest B. Hook πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 170 KB

Log-linear models for capture-recapture type data are widely used for estimating sizes of populations. Log-linear methods model conditional interactions between the sources. Often, however, the marginal associations are more appropriate and easier for the practitioner to conceptualize. Analyses here