✦ LIBER ✦

An alternative derivation of the Wigner-Weisskopf approximation

✍ Scribed by D.J. Diestler; H.Douglas Ladouceur

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1977
Tongue: English
Weight: 177 KB
Volume: 20
Category: Article
ISSN: 0030-4018
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4018(77)90149-3

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

An alternative derivation of Goddard's O

An alternative derivation of Goddard's Oii operator

✍ I.K. Snook 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 400 KB

The form of the operator Oii, which may be.used, to determine expectation values of any spin-free operator from Goddard's GI wavefunctions, is derived without the u,s-e of group theory. Furthermore in the most frequently used. czw (the GF method) the form of the operator may be readily determined f

An alternative derivation of the 4×4 pro

An alternative derivation of the 4×4 propagation matrix formalism

✍ Hiap Liew Ong 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 166 KB

An alternative derivation of Sobolev's l

An alternative derivation of Sobolev's large velocity gradient limit

✍ F.E. Irons 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 505 KB

An alternative derivation of the propert

An alternative derivation of the properties of the Alternant Molecular Orbital wave function

✍ P. Van Leuven 📂 Article 📅 1969 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 487 KB

Analysis of the local approximation in t

Analysis of the local approximation in the Wigner function theory

✍ G.Y. Wu 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 295 KB

An Analytical Derivation of a Popular Ap

An Analytical Derivation of a Popular Approximation of the Voigt Function for Quantification of NMR Spectra

✍ Stephen D Bruce; John Higinbotham; Ian Marshall; Paul H Beswick 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 94 KB

The approximation of the Voigt line shape by the linear summation of Lorentzian and Gaussian line shapes of equal width is well documented and has proved to be a useful function for modeling in vivo 1 H NMR spectra. We show that the error in determining peak areas is less than 0.72% over a range of