An abductive approach to disjunctive logic programming
β Scribed by Jia-Huai You; Li Yan Yuan; Randy Goebel
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 282 KB
- Volume
- 44
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0743-1066
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Nonmonotonic reasoning has been explored as a form of abductive reasoning where default assumptions are treated as abductive hypotheses. While the semantics and proof theories under this approach have been studied extensively, the question of how disjunctive programs may be used to reason abductively has rarely been investigated. At the center of the question is how to embed disjunctive reasoning into that of negation-as-failure. A more concrete question is about whether the elegant abductive proof procedure by Eshghi and Kowalski can be extended to answer queries for disjunctive programs, and if yes, what is the semantics that such an extended procedure computes. In this paper we answer these questions by formulating a semantics, the regular extension semantics, for disjunctive programs, and by presenting a sound and complete extension of the EshghiΒ±Kowalski procedure, called disjunctive EK procedure, for query answering with respect to ground disjunctive programs under this semantics.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
In this paper, we propose an argumentation-based semantic framework, called DAS, for disjunctive logic programming. The basic idea is to translate a disjunctive logic program into an argumentation-theoretic framework. One unique feature of our proposed framework is to consider the disjunctions of ne
A long outstanding problem for abduction in logic programming has been on how minimality might be defined. Without minimality, an abductive procedure is often required to generate exponentially many subsumed explanations for a given observation. In this paper, we propose a new definition of abductio
## ~> We propose a framework that supports the recognition of plans and intentions behind speech acts through abductive inferences over discourse sentences. These inferences allow each agent to have an active and intelligent participation in dialogues, namely, in cooperative information-seeking di