𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Ambivalence in (not about ) naturalistic decision making

✍ Scribed by Joshua Klayman

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
52 KB
Volume
14
Category
Article
ISSN
0894-3257

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Seeing is not enough: manipulating choic
Seeing is not enough: manipulating choice options causes focusing and preference change in multiattribute risky decision-making
✍ Ivo Vlaev; Nick Chater; Neil Stewart πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 194 KB

## Abstract We show that preferences depend on the attributes that can be directly manipulated when people need to integrate multiple sources of information because direct manipulation causes focusing bias. This effect appears even when all relevant information is simultaneously and explicitly pres

Decisions about amniocentesis by advance
Decisions about amniocentesis by advanced maternal age patients following maternal serum screening may not always correlate clinically with screening results: Need for improvement in informed consent process
✍ Marini, Tina ;Sullivan, Jan ;Naeem, Rizwan πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 62 KB

## Abstract We evaluated the prenatal diagnosis utilization patterns of advanced maternal age (AMA) patients who underwent serum screening to assess how screening results correlated with their decisions regarding amniocentesis. A 6‐year review (1994–1999) of laboratory records identified 2,456 AMA