𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Alternating chemotherapy with etoposide plus cisplatin and topotecan plus paclitaxel in patients with untreated, extensive-stage small cell lung carcinoma : A Phase II trial of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group

✍ Scribed by James R. Jett; Alan K. Hatfield; Shauna Hillman; Michael D. Bauman; James A. Mailliard; John W. Kugler; Roscoe F. Morton; Randolph S. Marks; Ralph Levitt


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
83 KB
Volume
97
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to test the response rate and toxicity of alternating chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with extensive‐stage small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC).

METHODS

Patients with histologically proven, extensive‐stage SCLC, with a performance status of 0–2, and who had received no prior chemotherapy were eligible. The design was a two‐stage, Phase II, multicenter trial. Treatment consisted of alternating chemotherapy every 3 weeks with etoposide (100 mg/m^2^ on Days 1–3) and cisplatin (30 mg/m^2^ on Days 1–3) on Cycles 1, 3, 5 and with topotecan (1 mg/m^2^ on Days 1–5) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m^2^ on Day 5) on Cycles 2, 4, and 6. Filgrastim support was given with Cycles 2, 4, 6.

RESULTS

Forty‐four patients were eligible and evaluable. The primary toxicity was myelosuppression. The median absolute neutrophil count was 300/μL with 70% Grade 4 neutropenia. The median platelet count was 58,000/μL with 23% Grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities occurred in 16% of patients. Overall toxicities were not different between the two regimens. There were no treatment‐related deaths. Complete or partial responses occurred in 34 patients (77%). The median time to progression was 6.9 months, with a median survival of 10.5 months and with 1‐year and 2‐year survival rates of 37% and 12%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The regimen of alternating chemotherapy was associated with substantial myelosuppression and resulted in a high response rate and good overall survival. The results were similar to those reported in prior trials and did not suggest any improvement in therapy for patients with SCLC. Cancer 2003;10:2498–503. © 2003 American Cancer Society.

DOI 10.1002/cncr.11377


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


UFT plus cisplatin combination chemother
✍ Yukito Ichinose; Kozo Yosimori; Shuichi Yoneda; Mutsuo Kuba; Shoji Kudoh; Hisano 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 77 KB 👁 2 views

## Background: Combination chemotherapy comprised of oral uft (a combination of tegafur and uracil) and cisplatin was shown to be an effective regimen for the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and to be associated with a low incidence rate of toxicity in a previous, single institut

A Phase II study of all-trans-retinoic a
✍ Gregory P. Kalemkerian; Michael Jiroutek; David S. Ettinger; John A. Dorighi; Da 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 84 KB 👁 2 views

The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute.

Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and topotecan i
✍ John D. Hainsworth; Lisa H. Morrissey; Daniel C. Scullin Jr.; Gerry Ann Houston; 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 83 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of a novel three‐drug regimen containing paclitaxel, carboplatin, and topotecan followed by oral etoposide in the first‐line treatment of patients with small cell lung carcinoma. ## METHO

A multicenter, randomized, Phase II stud
✍ Filippo De Marinis; Fabrizio Nelli; Marco Lombardo; Francesco Ferraú; Santi Barb 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 122 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of combined cisplatin, etoposide, and gemcitabine (PEG) and combined cisplatin plus gemcitabine (PG) in previously untreated patients with extensive‐stage and poor‐prognosis limited‐stage small‐cell lun