𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Alcohol use while on the liver transplant waiting list: A single-center experience

✍ Scribed by Michelle Carbonneau; Louise A. Jensen; Vincent G. Bain; Karen Kelly; Glenda Meeberg; Puneeta Tandon


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
92 KB
Volume
16
Category
Article
ISSN
1527-6465

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is a leading indication for liver transplantation. Our center has randomly checked blood alcohol levels (BALs) in ALD patients on the waiting list since 2004. We aimed to identify the incidence and predictors of inactivation on the transplant list due to alcohol use and to determine the utility of BAL-screening in this process. We conducted a retrospective review of patients with ALD listed for liver transplantation with at least 3 months of postlisting follow-up. Alcohol use while on the transplant list was defined as a positive BAL, an admission of alcohol use, or refusal to perform screening within 12 hours of request. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate risk ratios (RRs). Of 134 patients meeting eligibility criteria, 78% were male, and mean age was 52 years. Alcohol use was documented in 23 patients (17%). Of these, 12 refused to have a random screen, 8 had detectable serum ethanol levels, and 3 had self-reported alcohol use. On multivariable analysis, a higher number of random BAL-checks [RR Ο­ 0.63(0.52, 0.76), P Ο­ 0.001] and a longer duration of prelisting abstinence [RR Ο­ 0.88(0.83, 0.94), P Ο­ 0.001] independently reduced the risk of alcohol use by patients while on the waiting list. None of the patients with ΟΎ24 months of prelisting abstinence had a positive screen. In conclusion, this study supports random BAL-screening before transplantation and reinforces the importance of abstinence duration as a predictor of relapse. For patients with Ο½24 months of prelisting abstinence, our center will increase the frequency of random BAL screening and increase the rehabilitation requirements to include an intensive 3-week rehabilitation program. We hope that these measures will reduce the rate of relapse to alcohol use post-transplantation.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Removing patients from the liver transpl
✍ Kevin P. Charpentier; Arun Mavanur πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 383 KB

Guidelines are in place regarding who is a candidate for liver transplantation. Once a potential candidate is listed, there are no uniform guidelines indicating when he should be removed from the list because of a change in clinical status. A survey with 14 scenarios was sent to the medical and surg

A single-center experience of 500 liver
✍ Arianeb Mehrabi; Zhoobin A. Mood; Hamidreza Fonouni; Arash Kashfi; Norbert Hille πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 147 KB

Over the past 4 decades, the surgical techniques of liver transplantation (LTx) have permanently evolved and been modified. Among these, the modified piggyback (MPB) technique by Belghiti offers specific advantages. The objective of this study was to present our single-center experience with the MPB

Liver transplantation and pancreatic res
✍ John A. Stauffer; Jeffery L. Steers; Hugo Bonatti; Marjorie K. Dougherty; Jaime πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 104 KB

Liver transplantation may occasionally be indicated in patients with unique clinical scenarios. Little is known regarding the outcomes of patients who have had a pancreatic resection prior to, in combination with, or after liver transplantation. A retrospective review of all patients undergoing live

Critical use of extended criteria donor
✍ Salvatore Gruttadauria; Giovanni Vizzini; Domenico Biondo; Lucio MandalΓ ; Riccar πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 200 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

This study presents our experience with the use of extended criteria donor (ECD) liver grafts. One hundred fifteen liver transplants were divided into 2 groups: standard (S) and nonstandard (NS). Fifty-eight patients in group S received a liver procured from an ideal donor, whereas 57 patients in gr

Liver transplantation using controlled d
✍ Hani P. Grewal; Darrin L. Willingham; Justin Nguyen; Winston R. Hewitt; Bucin C. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 191 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

The use of donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors may provide a valuable source of organs for liver transplantation. Concerns regarding primary nonfunction (PNF) and intrahepatic biliary stricture (IHBSs) have limited the enthusiasm for their use. A retrospective analysis of 1436 consecutive dece

Experience after the evaluation of 700 p
✍ Camino ValentΓ­n-Gamazo; Massimo MalagΓ³; Marc Karliova; Juergen T. Lutz; Andrea F πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 153 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Adequate selection of donors is a major prerequisite for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Few centers report on the entire number of potential donors considered or rejected for living donation. From April 1998 to July 2003, a total of 111 living donor liver transplantations were performed