Four methods for estimating the uncertainties in air pollution measurements are outlined. The approaches are: analytical solution -approximation; application of distribution theory; experimentation; and simulation. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are illustrated using data from High-
Air pollution-mortality models: A demonstration of the effects of random measurement error
β Scribed by Kenneth A. Bollen; Richard C. Schwing
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1987
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 685 KB
- Volume
- 21
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0033-5177
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This paper explores the implications of measurement error in the analysis of compliance}response relationships in data from randomized trials. Given that compliance measures are rarely, if ever, error-free indicators of exposure it is argued that both the designs for the collection of compliance dat
We explore the effects of measurement error in a time-varying covariate for a mixed model applied to a longitudinal study of plasma levels and dietary intake of beta-carotene. We derive a simple expression for the bias of large sample estimates of the variance of random effects in a longitudinal mod
## Abstract The relationship between shortβterm exposure to air pollution and mortality or morbidity has been the subject of much recent research, in which the standard method of analysis uses Poisson linear or additive models. In this paper, we use a Bayesian dynamic generalised linear model (DGLM