𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

AGENCY CONFLICT AND CORPORATE STRATEGY: THE EFFECT OF DIVESTMENT ON CORPORATE VALUE

✍ Scribed by PETER WRIGHT; STEPHEN P. FERRIS


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
83 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
0143-2095

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Among the various stakeholders of a firm, senior managers are the most likely targets for private and public political pressures. Other stakeholder groups are less visible and may be perceived as less influential in corporate strategy formulation and implementation. In some situations, consequently, senior executives may adopt corporate strategies in response to political pressures even if these strategies may be costly to shareholders. In this study, a special case is examined: the effect of divestment of South African business units on firm value. Using data from 1984 through 1990, we examine the impact that announcements of divestments have upon the stock return behavior of publicly traded firms. Our results indicate that significant and negative excess returns accrue to shares of companies announcing divestments of South African operations. These results are supportive of the premise that noneconomic pressures may influence managerial strategies rather than value-enhancement goals.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Agency theory and the influence of equit
✍ David J. Denis; Diane K. Denis; Atulya Sarin πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 39 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

We articulate the agency theory view of managerial decision making and its implications for corporate diversification strategies. From agency theory, we generate testable predictions for the relation between equity ownership structure and diversification strategies and review the existing evidence o

Exploring the moderating effect of finan
✍ Hayam Wahba πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 91 KB

## Abstract Much of the existing literature has argued that those firms that invest in environmental initiatives attract more institutional investors. A noticeable problem with these studies is the assumption that the relationship between institutional investors and corporate environmental responsi