Against Innocence: An Introduction to Gillian Rose
✍ Scribed by Andrew Shanks
- Publisher
- Hymns Ancient & Modern Ltd
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 225
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Gillian Rose (1947â€"1995) was a highly original, enigmatic and pugnacious thinker, whose work draws together Continental philosophy, sociology, modern / post-modern Jewish and Christian reflection on ethics. She was also, famously, a convert to Christianity, baptised into the Church of England on her deathbed, from Judaism. She has been a major influence on many contemporary thinkers, not least on the thought of the Archbishop Rowan Williams. Her writings are teasingly poetic, often forbiddingly difficult, and yet at the same time vividly accessible, at any rate through her widely praised memoir, Love’s Work Here, a Church of England priest writes about Rose’s thought as it relates to the future of the Church she eventually joined. A significant philosopher of this century, they believe her thinking implicitly points towards a new form of Christian self-understanding. This captivatingly well written book is the first major study of Gillian Rose’s thought from a theological point of view. It aims to make the work of this highly complex thinker accessible to a wider readership.
✦ Table of Contents
Contents
Foreword
Acknowledgements
A Deathbed Baptism
Against ‘Holocaust Piety’
The ‘Question of Law’
‘Thinking the Absolute’
Against Modern ‘Gnosticism’
The Threefold Moral of the Disaster
Against ‘Holy Middles’ in General
Unwrapping the Gift
Notes
Bibliography
Acknowledgements
Index
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Irreverent and incisive critique of liberal theories of the state.
Irreverent and incisive critique of liberal theories of the state.
Thomas Jefferson famously wrote that the earth belongs to the living. His letter to James Madison is often quoted for the proposition that we should not be bound to the 'dead hand of the past', suggesting that the Constitution should instead be interpreted as a living, breathing document. Less well-
<i>Irreverent and incisive critique of liberal theories of the state.</i>