Between 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson defined affirmative action as a legitimate federal goal, and 1972, when President Richard M. Nixon named one of affirmative action's chief antagonists the head of the Department of Labor, government officials at all levels addressed racial economic ineq
Affirmative Action : Legislating Equality and Opportunity
โ Scribed by Mary-Lane Kamberg
- Publisher
- Rosen Publishing Group
- Year
- 2014
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 82
- Series
- A Celebration of the Civil Rights Movement Ser.
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Since the 1960s, the United States government has issued executive orders and passed legislation aimed at achieving fair workplace hiring practices. Critics maintain that, in an attempt to ameliorate past injustices, the government has gone too far by practicing affirmative action--what opponents call "reverse discrimination." Students can use this book as a guide to the history of affirmative action, crucial moments in the timeline of this cause, and a better understanding of what affirmative actions practices may mean for the future.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
โข How has Bakke shaped our understanding of race, access to education, and affirmative action?โข Will Bakke remain relevant for the future, legally and politically?โข Can we use Bakke to re-envision affirmative action in higher education?Published to mark the 30th anniversary of the Supreme Courtโs Ba
Egalitarians have traditionally been suspicious of equality of opportunity. But the past twenty five years or so have seen a sea-change in egalitarian thinking about that concept. 'Luck egalitarians' such as G. A. Cohen, Richard Arneson, and John Roemer have paved a new way of thinking about equalit
In this book, two distinguished philosophers debate one of the most controversial public policy issues of the late 20th century. Each begins by making a case for or against affirmative action, laying out the major arguments on both sides. Each author then responds to the other's essay. Written in an