This article explores several facets of bipolarity in human reasoning and affective decision making. First, it examines how positive and negative pieces of information help to discriminate between classical forms of reasoning (deduction, induction, and abduction). It is shown that (1) both positive
Affect and decision making: a “hot” topic
✍ Scribed by Ellen Peters; Daniel Västfjäll; Tommy Gärling; Paul Slovic
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 77 KB
- Volume
- 19
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-3257
- DOI
- 10.1002/bdm.528
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The seven papers in this special issue represent the breadth and complexity of approaches to the study of affect in judgment and decision processes. Four papers examine the role of arousal or specific emotions in decision making. The three other papers investigate the impacts of uncertainty, time course, and thinking about mood. We briefly describe four functions of affect in decision making (affect as information, as a spotlight, as a motivator, and as common currency) and relate them to the seven special‐issue papers. The role of affect in decisions and decision processes is quite nuanced and deserves careful empirical study in basic and applied research. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract This article explores the effects of two cultural dimensions, face consciousness and risk aversion, on consumers' decision‐making styles. Data from China and the United States show that consumers in the United States differ from their counterparts in China in decision‐making styles. Fac
This research note extends the research on ethical decision making in accounting by examining the effect of two variables, affect and tolerance of ambiguity, on ethics-related decisions made in two contexts: both personal and organizational settings. I conduct an experimental study among undergradua