Arti"cial neural networks are gaining widespread acceptance in cereal grain classi"cation and identi"cation tasks. The choice of a neural network architecture and input features can pose a problem for a novice user. This research is aimed at evaluating the most commonly used neural network architect
AE—Automation and Emerging Technologies: Specialist Neural Networks for Cereal Grain Classification
✍ Scribed by N.S. Visen; J. Paliwal; D.S. Jayas; N.D.G. White
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 147 KB
- Volume
- 82
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1537-5110
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
In the past few years, artificial neural networks have gained widespread acceptance for cereal grain classification and identification tasks. With the availability of different types of neural network architectures, the choice of the architecture for a particular task becomes crucial. It was hypothesized that robust specialist networks can be designed using a combination of simple networks having similar or different network architectures. To test this hypothesis, the classification accuracies of four simple network architectures (namely, back propagation network (BPN), Ward network, general regression neural network (GRNN) and probabilistic neural network (PNN)) were compared with the accuracies given by specialist networks. Each specialist network was designed using a combination of five simple networks, each specializing in classifying one grain type. The grain types used in this study were Canada Western Red Spring (CWRS) wheat, Canada Western Amber Durum (CWAD) wheat, barley, oats and rye. To evaluate the classification accuracy of the different neural network architectures, high resolution colour images of 7500 kernels (1500 kernels of each grain type) were taken for training and testing of networks. For each kernel, eight morphological features (namely, area, perimeter, length of major axis, length of minor axis, elongation, roundness, Feret diameter and compactness) and four colour features (namely, mean, median, mode and standard deviation of the grey-level values of the objects in the image) were extracted and used as input to the neural networks. Best classification accuracies (98Á7, 99Á3, 96Á7, 98Á4, and 96Á9 for barley, CWRS wheat, CWAD wheat, oats and rye, respectively) were obtained using specialist probabilistic neural networks.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Neural networks have recently gained popularity as an alternative to regression models to characterize biological processes. Their decision-making capabilities can be best used in image analysis of biological products where the shape and size classi"cation is not governed by any mathematical functio
A machine vision system using a charge coupled device camera for the weed detection in a radish farm was developed. Shape features were analysed with the binary images obtained from colour images of radish and weeds. Aspect, elongation and perimeter to broadness were selected as significant variable
Backpropagation neural networks with five data coding schemes were used to predict maize yield at three scales in east-central Indiana of the Midwest USA, using 1901-1996 local crop-stage weather data and yield data from farm, county, and state levels. Input data included precipitation and air tempe
A machine vision method has been developed for the detection of adult beetles, rodent droppings and ergot in harvested wheat. Samples were presented as a monolayer of around 25 generally non-touching but randomly oriented objects. Detection rates for artificially prepared samples ranged from 87% for