𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Adjuvant therapy of osteosarcoma—A Phase II trial : Southwest Oncology Group study 9139

✍ Scribed by Mark M. Zalupski; Cathryn Rankin; James R. Ryan; David R. Lucas; Jeffrey Muler; Keith S. Lanier; George Thomas Budd; J. Sybil Biermann; Frederick J. Meyers; Karen Antman


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
101 KB
Volume
100
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to estimate the time to treatment failure and survival rate of the three‐drug combination of doxorubicin, cisplatin, and ifosfamide as primary and postoperative, adjunctive treatment for teenagers and adults with osteosarcoma (OS).

METHODS

Sixty‐three eligible patients with nonmetastatic OS of the extremities were registered from 24 institutions from February, 1992 through December, 1996. Chemotherapy was comprised of doxorubicin at a dose of 75 mg/m^2^ and cisplatin at a dose of 120 mg/m^2^, alternating with doxorubicin at a dose of 50 mg/m^2^ and ifosfamide at a dose of 8 g/m^2^. Four cycles were given prior to surgical resection, and four cycles were given after surgery. Outcome measures included the time to treatment failure, overall survival, toxicity, and centralized assessment of tumor necrosis.

RESULTS

Thirty‐one of 63 eligible patients died, for a 5‐year overall survival rate of 58% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 46–71%). The median time to treatment failure was 19 months (95% CI, 12–41 months). A good pathologic response (≥ 90% necrosis) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was observed in 48% of patients who underwent surgery. There was no correlation noted between response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and patient outcome. Grade 4 hematologic toxicities were frequent (89%), although serious nonhematologic toxicities other than nausea and emesis were uncommon.

CONCLUSIONS

The regimen and schedule used in the current study did not improve outcomes compared with prior trials of doxorubicin and cisplatin alone. New, more effective drugs are needed for the treatment of patients with OS. The identification and utilization of molecular markers to predict outcome and response to therapy would facilitate clinical management, limiting exposure to toxic therapies for patients with favorable molecular profiles and identifying those patients who may fail with current approaches as candidates for clinical trials. Cancer 2004;100:818–25. © 2004 American Cancer Society.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Phase II evaluation of bleomycin. A Sout
✍ Charles D. Haas; Charles A. Coltman Jr.; Jeffrey A. Gottlieb; Arthur Haut; James 📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 369 KB 👁 2 views

Bleomycin given intravenously (i.v.) or intramuscularly (i.m.) in twice-weekly doses of 10 mg/mz was evaluated for efficacy and toxicity in 382 patients. Responses were observed in 11/27 Hodgkin's diseases, 10/30 lymphomas, 9/22 squamous cell cancers of ectodermal origin, 12/26 germinal cancers, and

A Phase II trial of vinorelbine tartrate
✍ Robert P. Whitehead; James Moon; S. Spence McCachren; Evan M. Hersh; Wolfram E. 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 84 KB 👁 3 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Single‐agent chemotherapy with dacarbazine continues to be the standard of care for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. However, there is a large population of patients who have failed first‐line therapy and might benefit from additional treatment. In the current study,

Phase II trial of carboplatin and paclit
✍ Ulka N. Vaishampayan; James R. Faulkner; Eric J. Small; Bruce G. Redman; Wayne L 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 86 KB

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin and paclitaxel administered every 3 weeks in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, previously treated with cisplatin‐based therapy. ## METHODS Eligibility included metastatic or local