๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Adequacy evaluation of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the breast health clinic setting

โœ Scribed by Howell, Lydia P. ;Gandour-Edwards, Regina ;Folkins, Katherine ;Davis, Robin ;Yasmeen, Shagufta ;Afify, Alaa


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
98 KB
Volume
102
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


BACKGROUND.

Breast health clinics (BHC) are an unfamiliar source of fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs) in the U.S. and create challenges for adequacy evaluation. The current study described the experience with breast FNAB adequacy evaluation over a 2-year period, the issues that emerged, and the problem-solving employed to mitigate these issues.

METHODS.

The rate of unsatisfactory FNABs and core biopsies was determined for pathologists, BHC providers, and other clinicians and compared for two different periods. Adequacy criteria during both periods required correlation of the cytologic findings with the clinical and breast imaging findings, and did not require identification of a specific number of ductal epithelial cells.

RESULTS.

During the first time period, 25% of breast FNABs performed in the BHC received an inadequate evaluation versus 6% performed by pathologists and 14% performed by other clinicians. The BHC adequacy rate exceeded the 20% upper threshold recommended by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and did not decrease after additional FNAB training. During the first time period, 24% of core biopsies received an adequacy evaluation of unsatisfactory. During the second time interval, the core biopsy volume increased and 12% received an unsatisfactory adequacy evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS. It is appropriate to use noncellular features such as clinical and

imaging findings as adequacy criteria for breast FNABs rather than identification of a minimal number of ductal epithelial cells. However, the 20% upper threshold for unsatisfactory breast FNABs recommended by the NCI was not appropriate for the BHC setting because the nature of the lesions seen in this type of practice can lead to an increase in inadequate specimens and cause unnecessary concern regarding quality. The authors recommended that laboratories receiving a large number of clinician-performed FNABs from a community population, especially a BHC, define their own unsatisfactory threshold above which they will investigate for technical or other problems. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2004;102:295-301.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the bre
โœ Sanchez, Miguel A. ;Stahl, Rosalyn E. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 44 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

I n this issue of Cancer Cytopathology, Manfrin et al. 1 describe the quality performance results of fine-needle aspiration biopsies performed in their Breast Cancer Screening Program in Verona, Italy. Not surprisingly, because they have an integrated radiopathologic program with pathologists on the

The uniform approach to breast fine-need
โœ National Cancer Institute Fine-Needle Aspiration of Breast Workshop Subcommittee ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 126 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Recommendations Indications I. Indications for performance of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or core biopsies in palpable breast lesions A. Sufficiently defined palpable breast masses of clinical or patient concern should be aspirated regardless of imaging findings where experienced FNA services are a

Fine-needle aspiration of the breast: Ce
โœ Abele, John S. ;Wagner, L. Thomas ;Miller, Theodore R. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 66 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

I n this issue of Cancer Cytopathology, Drs. Boerner and Sneige 1 propose that aspirate samplings with fewer than six epithelial cell clusters be considered nondiagnostic. In their opening remarks they correctly note that among experts "there is no agreement on whether the presence of epithelial cel