Pineau and Mudry have provided some interesting points of discussion to a recent paper\*\*. The present note offers some further discussion of the points raised. Statistical evidence is presented that the new two-parameter function of the present author [1] does indeed fit the data which has already
✦ LIBER ✦
Additional comment; Response; Discussion of “The Non-Conservatism of the Weibull Function when Applied to the Statistics of Fracture Toughness,” by A. Pineau and F. Mudry
✍ Scribed by D. J. Neville
- Book ID
- 105016953
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1989
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 45 KB
- Volume
- 40
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1573-2673
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Response: Discussion of “The non-conserv
✍
D. J. Neville
📂
Article
📅
1989
🏛
Springer Netherlands
🌐
English
⚖ 271 KB
Discussion; “The non-conservatism of the
✍
A. Pineau; F. Mudry
📂
Article
📅
1989
🏛
Springer Netherlands
🌐
English
⚖ 262 KB
In a recent publication Neville discussed recent models proposed for the distribution of fracture toughness which are based on the Weibull statistics. He emphasized the fact that these models are potentially dangerously non-conservative. In this paper Neville referred essentially to three Weibull ba
The authors' reply to the discussion on
✍
Ford, R.L.; West, J.C.; Douce, J.L.; Naylor, R.; Dalton, I.R.
📂
Article
📅
1954
🏛
Institution of Electrical Engineers
⚖ 307 KB