## Abstract Forty‐five proton chemical shifts in 14 aromatic molecules have been calculated at several levels of theory: Hartree–Fock and density functional theory with several different basis sets, and also second‐order Møller–Plesset (MP2) theory. To obtain consistent experimental data, the NMR s
Accurate prediction of proton chemical shifts. II. Peptide analogues
✍ Scribed by Bing Wang; James F. Hinton; Peter Pulay
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 95 KB
- Volume
- 23
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0192-8651
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Proton chemical shifts of eight cyclic amide molecules were measured in DMSO and D~2~O solutions. The magnetic shieldings of the corresponding aliphatic, aromatic, and amide protons were calculated by Hartree‐Fock and DFT, using the 6‐311G**, 6‐311++G**, and TZVP basis sets. For aliphatic protons, all of these methods reproduce the experimental values in DMSO solutions excellently after linear regression. The Hartree‐Fock method tends to give slightly better agreement than DFT. The best performance is given by the HF/6‐311G** method, with an rms deviation of 0.068 ppm. The deviations from experimental chemical shifts in D~2~O solutions are only slightly larger than those in DMSO solutions. This suggests that we can use the calculated gas phase proton chemical shifts directly to predict experimental data in various solvents, including water. For amide protons, which exchange with water and form hydrogen bonds with DMSO, only modest agreement is obtained, as expected. The present studies confirm that the GIAO approach can reach high accuracy for the relative chemical shifts of aliphatic and aromatic protons at a low cost. Such calculations may provide constraints for the conformational analysis of proteins and other macromolecules. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 23: 492–497, 2002; DOI 10.1002/jcc.10044
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Torsion angle restraints are frequently used in the determination and refinement of protein structures by NMR. These restraints may be obtained by J coupling, cross-correlation measurements, nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs) or secondary chemical shifts. Currently most backbone (phi/psi) torsion ang
## Abstract Accurate random coil α‐proton chemical shift values are essential for precise protein structure analysis using chemical shift index (CSI) calculations. The current study determines the chemical shift effects of pH, urea, peptide length and neighboring amino acids on the α‐proton of Ala