## Abstract The flip angle which maximizes contrast between materials with different __T__~1~can be caculatd from the root of a cubic expression. A simple closed form expression can be used if contrast is defined in a differential sense and results in only slight contrast loss even with large __T__
Accurate flip-angle calibration for 13C MRI
✍ Scribed by Ileana Hancu; Ronald Watkins; Susan J. Kohler; Richard P. Mallozzi
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 347 KB
- Volume
- 58
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0740-3194
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
^13^C imaging and spectroscopy in the presence of injected labeled compounds can vastly extend the capability of MRI to perform metabolic imaging. The details of imaging in the presence of injected compounds, however, pose new technological challenges. Pulse sequences, in general, rely on precise flip‐angle (FA) calibration to create high signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), artifact‐free images. Signal quantification also requires precise knowledge of the excitation FA. In MRI scans that rely on signal acquisitions from injected compounds, however, such FA calibration is challenged by low natural‐abundance ^13^C signal levels before injection, and by time‐varying signal following injection. A method to precisely set the FA at the ^13^C frequency based on FA calibration at the ^23^Na frequency is presented here. A practical implementation of a coil (a dual‐tuned, ^23^Na/^13^C low‐pass birdcage coil) suitable for this calibration in vivo is also documented. Accurate FA calibration is demonstrated at the ^13^C frequency for in vivo rat experiments using this approach. Magn Reson Med 58:128–133, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Most traditional methods for __T__~1~ map estimation in MRI with fast low‐angle‐shot sequences are aimed at high efficiency by compromising the fitting accuracy. In this paper, the __fundamental__ problem of parameter estimation in fast low‐angle‐shot MRI was re‐examined, and an accurat