𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Accuracy of the 15-item geriatric depression scale (GDS-15) in a community sample of the oldest old

✍ Scribed by Anton J. M. de Craen; T. J. Heeren; Jacobijn Gussekloo


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
50 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
0885-6230

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Background:

Cognitive impairment is common in the oldest old. this might influence the sensitivity and specificity of the 15-item geriatric depression scale (gds-15). few studies, however, have included subjects older than 85 years to evaluate the gds-15 as a screening instrument for depression.

Objective:

To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the gds-15 in a community sample of the oldest old.

Methods:

Seventy-nine subjects aged 85 and over were enrolled in the study. the gds-15 and the mini-mental state examination (mmse) were administered by a trained interviewer. within two days the geriatric mental state (gms)/agecat, was administered to obtain a clinical diagnosis of depression.

Results:

Eight subjects (10%) were diagnosed with clinical depression. at a cut-off point of 3/4 the sensitivity and specificity of the gds-15 were 88% and 76% respectively. in the group with mmse scores of 28 and higher sensitivity was unaffected at all cut-off points while specificity increased. in the group with mmse scores below 28 sensitivity was also unaffected at all cut-off points while specificity decreased.

Conclusion:

The gds-15 is a suitable instrument to diagnose depression in the general population of the oldest old. the optimal cut-off point depends on its intended use. in subjects with cognitive impairment the accuracy should be investigated further.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Differences in depression symptoms in pa
✍ Daniel Weintraub; Sharon Xie; Jason Karlawish; Andrew Siderowf πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 93 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## Objective Depression occurs frequently in patients with both Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD), but there has been little comparison of depression symptoms in the two populations. ## Method The 15‐item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS‐15) was administered as a d

The 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (
✍ David J. Vinkers; Jacobijn Gussekloo; Max L. Stek; Rudi G. J. Westendorp; Roos C πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 73 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Background The 15‐item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS‐15) is a widely used screening instrument for depressive symptoms in the elderly, but its ability to detect alterations in depressive symptoms over time has not been established. ## Objective To assess the change of the GDS‐15

Validation of the Spanish version of the
✍ M. I. FernΓ‘ndez-San MartΓ­n; C. Andrade; J. Molina; P. E. MuΓ±oz; B. Carretero; M. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 84 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Objective To estimate the predictive value of the 30‐question Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) in Spanish and calculate the most adequate cut‐point for its use in Primary Health Care consultations. ## Method 218 patients over the age of 64 treated at three health centers of Area 1

Diagnostic accuracy of the original 30-i
✍ K. Jongenelis; A. M. Pot; A. M. H. Eisses; D. L. Gerritsen; M. Derksen; A. T. F. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 87 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the 30-item and shortened versions of the geriatric depression scale (gds) in diagnosing depression in older nursing home patients. ## Method: Three hundred and thirty-three older nursing home patients participated in a prospective cross-secti

Erratum: Validation of the Spanish versi
✍ M. I. FernΓ‘ndez-San MartΓ­n; C. Andrade; J. Molina; P. E. MuΓ±oz; B. Carretero; M. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 36 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2002; 17: 279–287 DOI: 10.1002/gps.588 It has come to our attention that there was an error to one of the author names within this published article. The correct author listing is now published below. We apologise for this anomaly. M. I.