## Abstract ## Purpose: To evaluate the repeatability of the dGEMRIC (delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI of cartilage) method in osteoarthritis‐prone knee joints for three different T1 quantification techniques: two‐dimensional inversion recovery (2D‐IR), three‐dimensional Look‐Locker (3D‐LL), and th
Accuracy of T1 measurement with 3-D Look-Locker technique for dGEMRIC
✍ Scribed by Wei Li; Rachel Scheidegger; Ying Wu; Anthony Vu; Pottumarthi V. Prasad
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 373 KB
- Volume
- 27
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose
To validate the accuracy of T1 measurement by three‐dimensional Look‐Locker method (3D LL) for delayed gadolinium‐enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) of human subjects with and without osteoarthritis (OA), as compared with two‐dimensional inversion recovery fast spin‐echo (2D IR‐FSE) technique.
Materials and Methods
MR sagittal images of the knees were acquired for T1 mapping in 29 subjects with standard 2D IR‐FSE and 3D LL sequences 90–135 min following administration of 0.2 mmol/kg Gd‐DTPA^2−^. T1 maps of femoral and tibial cartilage were generated using custom software. Comparisons in T1 values between the two techniques were performed using regression analysis.
Results
Good agreement in T1 values between 2D IR‐FSE and 3D LL was observed (R values of 0.90, and 0.85, and 0.86 for all, OA, and control subjects, respectively) when acquired within 15 min.
Conclusion
The 3D LL sequence provides accurate T1 estimates of articular cartilage with advantages of entire joint coverage, shorter acquisition time, and a wide range of inversion times sampled within a single acquisition. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Purpose To propose a simple, accurate method for measuring __T__~1~ in flowing blood and the arterial input function (AIF), and to evaluate the impact on dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI (DCE‐MRI) quantification of pharmacokinetic parameters. ## Materials and Methods A total of 10 ra
## Abstract ## Purpose: To compare nongated three‐dimensional (3D) contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE‐MRA) with 3D‐navigated cardiac‐gated steady‐state free‐precession bright blood (3D‐nav SSFP) and noncontrast 2D techniques for ascending aorta dimension measurements. ## Materia