๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Accuracy of medicare claims data in identifying Parkinsonism cases: Comparison with the medicare current beneficiary survey

โœ Scribed by Katia Noyes; Hangsheng Liu; Robert Holloway; Andrew W. Dick


Book ID
102505757
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
68 KB
Volume
22
Category
Article
ISSN
0885-3185

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

Study Purpose

Administrative databases are commonly used to examine use of healthcare service, with researchers relying on diagnostic codes to identify medical conditions. This study evaluates the accuracy of administrative claims in identifying Parkinsonism cases compared to the selfโ€reported Parkinson's disease (PD).

Methods

The reference cases were identified based on the selfโ€reported PD status and the use of PD drugs collected by the 1992โ€“2000 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey that contained 72,922 observations from 30,469 individuals. Using ICDโ€9 CM, cases with PD were extracted from the corresponding Medicare claims. We compared prevalence of PD obtained using different types of claims.

Results

The sensitivities were the highest when all claims were used (66%). All the specificities were greater than 99%. When drug use information was included in the gold standard, the sensitivities became lower, while the specificities and positive predictive values (PPVs) increased. Using more diagnostic codes improved the sensitivity of the identification process but reduced PPVs.

Conclusions

Administrative claims can provide fairly accurate and practical approach to โ€œrule inโ€ patients with PD. Depending on the purpose of evaluation, researchers may consider using more categories of claims to improve the sensitivity of the identification algorithm or use fewer diagnoses to minimize number of false positive cases. ยฉ 2006 Movement Disorder Society


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES