𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section diagnosis in head and neck surgery: Experience at a university medical center

✍ Scribed by Dr. Regina F. Gandour-Edwards; Paul J. Donald; David A. Wiese


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1993
Tongue
English
Weight
522 KB
Volume
15
Category
Article
ISSN
1043-3074

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

We performed 2,210 intraoperative frozen sections on 258 patients from the Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Service in 1990 and 1991. Surgery involved a wide variety of benign and malignant lesions. Techniques included biopsies for diagnosis, simple excisions, thyroid and salivary gland surgeries, lymph node biopsies, composite resections with radical neck dissections, laryngectomies, and skull base surgeries. During the 2‐year period, 1,947 (88.1%) sections were requested for evaluation of surgical margins, 258 (11.7%) for diagnosis, and five (0.2%) cases for tissue identification. There was disagreement between the frozen section and permanent section in 46 (2.1%) cases, and the deferral diagnosis rate was 0.8%. Disagreements were the result of sampling errors in 33 and interpretive errors in 13 cases. There were six (0.3%) false‐negative diagnosis of malignancy and four (0.2%) false‐positive diagnoses of malignancy. Three of these had an impact on patient care as discussed. We recommend careful sampling and sectioning of small biopsies and the need for vigilant communication between surgeon and pathologist.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Clinical utility of intraoperative froze
✍ Dr. Regina F. Gandour-Edwards; Paul J. Donald; J. T. Lie 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 320 KB 👁 2 views

The technical and professional issues that affect the clinical util-Ity of intraoperative frozen section diagnosis in head and neck surgery are addressed from a quality assurance perspective. The most common reasons for sampling errors and interpretive errors are discussed. We offer several recommen