Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening of cervical neoplasia: Results from a multicenter study in India
✍ Scribed by Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan; Ramdas Chatterji; Surendra S. Shastri; Ramani S. Wesley; Partha Basu; Cédric Mahe; Richard Muwonge; Daniel Seigneurin; Thara Somanathan; Chinmoy Roy; Rohini Kelkar; Roshini Chinoy; Ketayun Dinshaw; Ranajit Mandal; Geethanjali Amin; Smriti Goswami; Smarajit Pal; Sharmila Patil; Namrata Dhakad; Lucien Frappart; Bernard Fontaniere; IARC Multicenter Study Group on Cervical Cancer Prevention in India
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- French
- Weight
- 132 KB
- Volume
- 112
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7136
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The knowledge that cervical neoplasia are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has led to the evaluation of its role in screening. We evaluated the accuracy of HPV testing by Hybrid capture II (HC II) method in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and 3 (CIN 2 and 3) lesions in 4 cross‐sectional studies with common protocol and questionnaire in 3 different locations (Kolkata, Mumbai and Trivandrum) in India. These studies involved 18,085 women aged 25–65 years. The reference standard for final diagnosis was a combination of colposcopy/biopsy. All women were investigated with colposcopy and 3,116 received directed biopsy. The sensitivity of HPV testing for detecting CIN 2–3 lesions varied from 45.7% to 80.9% across the study sites; the specificity varied from 91.7% to 94.6% and the positive predictive value from 6.7% to 13.7%. Retesting of 298 randomly chosen denatured samples in France revealed an agreement rate of 85.9% and a κ‐value of 0.72. Although HPV testing seems to be a promising approach for cervical cancer prevention, a large range in sensitivity was observed in our study, possibly due to variations in the quality of specimen collection and reference standards. A higher sensitivity was associated with the center performing the test well. Further developments in terms of more reproducible, less expensive and less sophisticated testing are essential to make the test feasible and effective in low‐resource settings. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Visual inspection‐based screening tests, such as visual inspection with 4% acetic acid (VIA) and with Lugol's iodine (VILI), have been proposed as alternatives to cytology in mass screening programs. To date, there is only limited information on the accuracy of these tests in detecting
## Abstract A large‐scale epidemiologic survey on the prevalence of different types of human papillomavirus (HPV) in cervical cancer in China is indicated because of the implications for the development of diagnostic probes and vaccines against cervical cancer. A total of 809 cervical cancer specim
## Abstract Cervical cancer is the main cancer among women in sub‐Saharan Africa, India and other parts of the developing world. Evaluation of screening performance of effective, feasible and affordable early detection and management methods is a public health priority. Five screening methods, nake
## Abstract The impact of a single round of screening of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) on cervical cancer incidence and mortality was investigated in a cluster randomized trial in south India. Women 30–59 years of age in 113 clusters in Dindigul District were randomized to VIA screening