Accuracy of cartilage and subchondral bone spatial thickness distribution from MRI
✍ Scribed by Chris A. McGibbon; Jenny Bencardino; Eren D. Yeh; William E. Palmer
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 906 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose
To assess three‐dimensional measurement accuracy of articular cartilage (AC) and subchondral bone (SB) thickness from MRI.
Materials and Methods
A computer program was used to calculate AC and SB thickness from MRI (three‐dimensional spoiled gradient echo (SPGR), .31‐mm resolution, 1‐mm slice thickness) of six adult femoral heads. Specimens were imaged in five anatomical planes ranging between +30° to −30° from neutral and cut into 2‐mm thick sections along the five anatomical planes. Faxitron x‐ray was used to produce microradiographic (.05‐mm resolution) images of the sections.
Results
In‐plane measurement accuracy was .165 ± .108 mm for AC thickness and .387 ± .174 mm for SB thickness. Taking into account chemical‐shift misregistration in SB thickness, accuracy of measurements improved to .213 ± 128 mm. Out‐of‐plane (three‐dimensional) thickness accuracy of the model, assessed by numerical simulation, was .015 mm. However, three‐dimensional thickness errors in specimens were .319 ± .256 mm for AC and .253 ± .183 mm for SB thickness.
Conclusion
Errors in three‐dimensional AC thickness were attributed to volume‐averaging effects caused by oblique intersection of the image plane with the joint surface. Errors in three‐dimensional SB thickness were attributed to chemical‐shift artifact. We conclude that accuracy of AC thickness is within clinically acceptable standards but that more sophisticated pulse sequences are needed to improve the measurement of SB thickness. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003;17:703–715. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Background: The thickness of cortical bone and the density of cancellous bone have been shown to reflect local mechanical stress. However, little is known whether this also applies to the thickness of the subchondral mineralization zone (SMZ). Since the humeroulnar joint may be regarded as a model o