Four alpha heroes for one amazing price Luke Garnier isn't looking for a wife, just an heir. His faithful assistant seems the perfect surrogate...until their arrangement creates some world-rocking "employee benefits..". Henry Devonshire wants his father's empire, and the one person who can help him
Accommodating pregnant laboratory employees
β Scribed by Kenneth P Fivizzani
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 132 KB
- Volume
- 8
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1074-9098
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Accommodating pregnant laboratory employees
In research laboratories, pregnant employees may be exposed to teratogenic materials that may cause harm to a developing fetus. More commonly, the pregnant employee may have anxiety about working with other materials that are known or perceived to be hazardous. Written guidelines ensure that a standard procedure is used in all cases. The employer must provide information regarding the materials of concern. The employee should be encouraged to consult with occupational health, safety, and toxicological professionals. The employee and her supervisor should discuss any concerns related to specific job tasks. Accommodations can be made to alleviate the employee's anxiety. Documentation of employee-supervisor discussions emphasizes the employer's resolve to allay employee worries during pregnancy.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Reasonable accommodation under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for employees with mental disabilities is explored f3om a behavior analytic perspective. Although much of the attention in issues of reasonable accommodation is concentrated on persons with physical disabilities, it
The prevalence oj and risk factors .for, laboratory animal allergy (LAA) umong university employees were evaluated in a cross-sectional university-based study. A stratified random satnple was drawn based on current or no laboratory animal exposure and smoking status. Participants receilled a modifie
## Objectives: Evaluation of incidence and risk factors for development of laboratory animal allergy (LAA) among new hires previously unexposed to lab animals. Methods: Baseline, 6-month and yearly follow-up, questionnaires, pulmonary functions, and methacholine challenges were collected from 98 n
Blood lymphocytes from 59 federally employed Canadian laboratory workers, 137 nearby office employees, and 11 workers with a mixed employment history were examined for the presence of sister-chromatid exchanges and micronuclei. These laboratory workers were exposed routinely to a host of organic sol